File #: ID 15-0384    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/29/2015 In control: City Council
On agenda: 5/5/2015 Final action:
Title: Resolution Supporting House Bill 193: Prohibit Discriminatory Profiling
Attachments: 1. HB 193 Prohibit Discriminatory Profiling.pdf, 2. 15-0384 Resolution Supporting House Bill 193.pdf
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title
Resolution Supporting House Bill 193: Prohibit Discriminatory Profiling

Body
Department: Legislative
Council District: n/a

Public Hearing: n/a
Advertising Date/By: n/a

Contact 1 and Phone: Mayor Pro-Tem Johnson, Ext. 2396
Contact 2 and Phone: Tom Carruthers, Ext. 2320

PURPOSE:

This resolution supports House Bill 193: Prohibit Discriminatory Profiling, which was filed with the North Carolina General Assembly. Although the NC League of Municipalities has opined that this bill did not make the crossover deadline, the resolution presented herein supports the proposed legislation.

The purpose of this bill would be to 1) Prohibit the use of discriminatory profiling by law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties; 2) Increase the kind of information required to be reported by certain law enforcement agencies concerning traffic law enforcement; 3) Require certain law enforcement agencies to report certain statistical information concerning homicides; 4) Require law enforcement officers to receive annual education and training concerning discriminatory profiling; 5) Require that certain training be provided to members of neighborhood crime watch programs established by counties and cities; and 6) Authorize the creation of Citizen Review Boards by ordinance, which will investigate allegations of police misconduct.

The proposed Citizen Review Board will investigate allegations of excessive use of force, abuse of power, and discriminatory profiling. This bill would give the Citizen Review Board the power to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, and compel the production of evidence. It would also allow this quasi-judicial board to make findings and decisions on disciplinary actions of a law enforcement officer alleged to have committed misconduct. Further, the Board would have authority to recommend changes in policy to a city council and to the head of the law enforcement agency. The subpoena power would be enforc...

Click here for full text